My personal opinion is that the Evo is better in automatic than the Mavics.ĥ. The real edge goes to the Evo for its frame rate, as it is the only drone in this comparison that can record in 4K at 60 fps. Better in app editing/sharing/live streaming.Ĥ. Hyper-lapse, POI, Active Track, Asteroid, etc.Ĩ. Scanifly is not in partnership with Autel Robotics, DJI, EXO, Skydio or. Significantly better battery life in every test I've seen.ħ. Create new projects and upload photos from your drone or phone to share site. I'm sure hardcore Evo fans might argue this but based on the side by side data sheets from each manufacturer, the Mavic 2 Zoom just has more to offer.ģ.
I'd imagine that the Evo has similar settings in the menu.
In 2021, DJI took a 54 market share and Autel a 7 market share. Quite frankly, I LOVE arguing in video comments, it's a lot of fun! However, the truth of the matter is debating the color palate in AUTO is really silly since all it takes is a small adjustment on the Mavic to change it. Both are fantastic drone companies producing high-quality consumer and enterprise drones. Personally, I think either drone is a decent choice. The Nano has four, while DJI offer six, though orbit and rocket are there for both brands (probably the most useful). 1 day ago &0183 &32 Autels video engine lags well behind the Mavic 3, but this drone is a good option for photogs who want a large sensor with in-lens aperture control. Ken said the Evo wins, you seem to say the Mavic Zoom wins.
0 kommentar(er)
